Speaking where the bible speaks, and silent where the bible is silent.

Biblical Proof

The Herald of Truth is a nationwide brotherhood broadcast originating in Abilene, Texas, controlled and operated by Highland Church of Christ in Abilene, Texas. It is set up in such a way as to infringe on the organizational features of the Lord’s church. When you have an organizational arrangement unknown to the church of the apostles’ day, you have an unscriptural organization. The Herald of Truth is more than a religious broadcast. It is an organizational arrangement set up for co-operation on a national scale. It is the organ of expression of many churches of Christ.

In establishing the identity of the New Testament church the necessity of being scriptural in doctrine, worship, and name has received due emphasis. While these essential features have not been over emphasized, there are some other points that have been more or less minimized. The organization of the church, for instance, is vital, and scriptural work is an essential feature of its identity.

The local church has a work to do, and it has a scriptural right to receive money from other churches under certain circumstances to help it do the work. But the local church has no scriptural right to create and start a work designed to extend beyond the limits of its own spiritual and numerical needs, when such work is dependent on the funds from other churches. In such a work, the elders of the one church become agents for the contributing churches. A society of churches is thus formed, with one eldership acting as the central expediting board. In this arrangement the organizational feature of the New Testament church is transcended.

No congregation had pre-eminence over another in organizational arrangement. Elders did not oversee a work larger in design than local material, numerical, and spiritual needs. One eldership did not function on behalf of other elderships. Many congregations did not funnel money into and through one eldership for regional or national works. One eldership did not speak for churches of Christ. One local church did not function for many churches in evangelism or benevolence. There were no pressure tactics of “mother” churches on surrounding congregations. There was no shifting of benevolent responsibilities out of the hands of elders and deacons to public or state institutions. There was no centralization of benevolent or evangelistic funds of many congregations in a regional or national coordinating agency of elders of one congregation.

We must walk by what is written rather than by what is supposed (1 Cor 4:6). Brethren also need to learn that there is no scriptural way to organize the kind of nationwide, brotherhood work such as Herald of Truth, because there is no such arrangement authorized in the scriptures, and therefore, it cannot be scriptural.

The Herald of Truth arrangement is a system, but it is also an unscriptural organization and thus it cannot be expedient to any command given to the church, and it certainly is not a scriptural method for there is no scripture for such a combination of funds and authority under one eldership.

In the type operation seen in the Herald of Truth set-up of the Highland congregation in Abilene, Texas, a manner of organization is involved which is unscriptural. The term organization is often used in referring to mere orderly procedure. It is also used to mean an orderly procedure in a formal structural setup, and is used for a formal structure itself. The national broadcast entitled “Herald of Truth” involves the type organization seen in a formal structural set-up. Organization, in the formal usage of the word, is in some way subordinate to administration. In the work being done in Herald of Truth there is a structural organization of supporting churches with one centralized administrative body-the elders of the expediting church. The contributing churches do not give up their overall autonomy, but they do yield funds to a central administrative board which makes the decisions and expedites the expenditure of the funds of this, group of congregations. The principle of congregational cooperation is abused in this procedure, and the error is seen in the delegation or function by the contributing churches to the one central congregation.

Funds and efforts are combined under a central administrative organization. The principle of congregational autonomy is violated to the degree involved in the surrendering of funds to the receiving congregation’s administrative board. If congregations can surrender funds to a central administrative agency like this in one thing, they can do it in all things. That type of thing points in the direction of Protestant ecclesiastical organization and the Catholic hierarchy.

If a board outside the local congregation served as the central administrative agency, brethren would more readily recognize the evil; But when the eldership of a congregation serves as the central administrative agency, some brethren fail to see that the same principle is violated. The Christian Church has its “Home and State Missions Planning Council.” In the type set-up seen in Herald of Truth we have a nationwide radio and television planning and expediting council.

There must be in every organization of the Herald of Truth type, the office that plans or determines the function and the function which interprets the need and thus expedites the action. The Herald of Truth thing is an organization that necessitates that sort of organization and that sort of function. It is made of contributing congregations, and one functional congregation which plans, determines and expedites the action. The New Testament gives no authority for the eldership of one congregation to function in such a way relative to work that is not particularly their obligation.

When the eldership of a local congregation does the work God intended for it to do, in the way God intended for it to do it, it operates within scriptural authority. When it takes on an obligation calling for council and decision regarding work which is not its own local responsibility, and which is dependent on monies from other congregations, then it becomes board acting outside of the realm of the authority of elders.

Where is the New Testament teaching authorizing one church to solicit other churches for money so it in turn can expedite a nationwide, or brotherhood work? The actual broadcast, Herald of Truth, in an organized effort of a formal organization made up of a society of contributing churches which yields funds and responsibility to a central expediting office which in turn works under a board-the elders of the Highland Church of Christ. For this there is no scriptural authority.

Congregational autonomy is proven by taking the truth that elders were appointed in every church (Acts 14:23), and in showing that the oversight of elders was limited to the flock which was among them (I Peter 5:1-5). The doctrine of procedure regarding congregational cooperation is ascertained in the same way. That doctrine is one of congregational funds becoming associated for administration at the point of need, rather than at an administrative point in between the giving party and the needy recipient. Those who carried the relief were merely messengers. No congregation stood between giving congregations and receiving congregations and no congregation operated or acted as a center in a brotherhood work. The brethren in Antioch sent help directly to the elders of the brethren in Judea (Acts 11). The churches of Macedonia, Galatia and Corinth sent directly to the needy saints at Jerusalem (I Corinthians 16: 11 Corinthians 8, 9; Romans 15:26). The Philippian church sent directly to Paul as he moved south from Philippi (Philip 4:14-20), and helped him while he was in Rome by sending direct to him.

The Herald of Truth arrangement is but another display of the lack of faith in God’s ways of getting things done. The Herald of Truth originators, created this arrangement out of dissatisfaction with the examples of church action and church cooperation in the New Testament. The Lord’s church is being divided by brethren who insist on promoting organizational arrangements foreign to the New Testament church. When the history of the twentieth century church is written, the Herald of Truth promoters will look like the missionary society advocates of the last century.


Comments on: "Why Not The Herald of Truth" (1)

  1. Kent Bailey said:

    As you have correctly observed, Herald of Truth in its inception was an unscriptural arrangement being an organization that infringed upon the autonomy of the local church. Now that time has passed, this arrangement has grown even worse. Even though it was unscriptural in arrangement, there was a time (many years ago) where the truth was taught regarding the plan of Salvation, the oneness nature of the Lord’s church, and New Testament worship. Because of the contaminating nature of sin, Herald of Truth does not even teach any distinctive aspect of truth. It has digressed to the point where it operates under a board of directors and is non-distinctive in all of its programming.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: